what better way to celebrate the day of unconditional love than to describe a sex act with disgust and revulsion?
if you put your penis into another man's rectum and wiggle it around in excrement then obviously you shouldn't be allowed to marry that man! those kinds of things are meant for the private enjoyment of closeted politicians in airport and public park bathrooms who publicly denounce and legislate against love being present during such acts.
you can hire a prostitute to do those things to, but everyone knows you don't marry her or him.
if you truly believe in the sanctity of love and marriage you vehemently deny that you use your genitals in any way and you certainly deny that you would allow anyone to wiggle around in your excrement.
and when you truly believe in the sanctity of love and marriage, as representative nancy elliot obviously does, you must not ever acknowledge that there is any other way to live than you publicly pretend to live. man+woman+penis+vagina=baby. and that's it. that's all there should ever, ever be.
so soldier on nancy elliot.
and for the record, bitch on the right is TOTALLY imagining that "allowing that to happen to her".
So long as the laws remain such as they are today, employ some discretion: loud opinion forces us to do so; but in privacy and silence let us compensate ourselves for that cruel chastity we are obliged to display in public.
-marquis de sade