Tuesday, November 3, 2009

guest blog: we like kitties around here

captain molasses coady returns!

that's right, our first guest blogger to blog a second time is back:

This is, properly speaking, 2 days late, but better late than never.

First off, I’ll be up front about where this is going. I love Hello Kitty.

Yes, I know all the critiques about how commodity fetishism and neoliberal consumerism is destroying our culture and our planet and I’m fully committed to the fightback against global capitalism. But that doesn’t change the fact that I’ve got a purple Hello Kitty with a bear mask dangling from my cellphone and I’m darn proud of it.

Hello Kitty, for those who are not aware, turned 35 on Sunday. Yes, she was born in 1974. And not in Japan, but in London. England. If you were surprised by that, then you probably also don’t know that Hello Kitty is just a nickname, and her real name is Kitty White. She lives in the forest and is 5 apples high (which means of course that she weighs as much as 3 apples). You probably knew she liked to collect different coloured ribbons, but did you also know she loves to collect goldfish? And that her favourite toothpaste flavour is strawberry?

See there’s a lot to know about the enigmatic Kitty. And yes, I know the critiques. There’s the efforts to locate her in a heteronormative relationship with the introduction of her quasi-boyfriend, Dear Daniel. There’s the odd embrace of British neocolonialism: Kitty *White’s* boyfriend Dear Daniel spends most of his time in Africa where his father is a safari photographer. Thankfully things have been troubled a bit by the introduction of a love triangle – the friendly bear Tippy has apparently developed amorous designs on Kitty while Dear Daniel is off exploiting the global south. But anyway. All this – much like the latest three Star Wars movies, or the Catholic church – are merely humanity’s flawed efforts to warp a primordial myth to a narrow-minded politico-social agenda. I couldn’t care less about Dear Daniel or Tippy or even the diesel-guzzling bus that Kitty rides for the 4 kilometre trip to school every morning.

My respect is for the Kitty, and the Kitty alone.

And researchers suggest that’s the way it should be. Rob Walker, in his book “Buying In: The Secret Dialogue Between What We Buy and Who We Are” argues that the unassailable strength of Hello Kitty – in the face of most of the rest of global capitalism, which required elaborate efforts to craft histories and partisan ‘buy-in’ motivations onto the products they were trying to sell – lies in the fact that it is the very nature of her enigmatic expressionless face, and the fact we know virtually nothing about who she is or what she does, that we come to love her so much. We can project whatever values or ideas we want onto her. This is a valuable and all too rare commodity in today’s world, and explains in part why so many people of so many different ages, ethnicities, and social locations embrace her. She means, quite literally, only and already always what they want her to mean. Nothing more, nothing less. (Unless of course you happen to know her family’s secret apple pie recipe or the fact that the only way to tell her from her twin sister Mimi is the fact they each wear their ribbon over a different ear. )

(for an interesting blog about this, and the secret connection between Hello Kitty and Sarah Palin, check out: http://dangerousintersection.org/2008/10/09/hello-sarah-hello-kitty/ )

But Hello Kitty has even more subversive potential than most would give her credit for. Anne McKnight, in her excellent article “Good-bye Kitty, Hello War” (positions: east asia cultures critique - Volume 13, Number 1, Spring 2005) uses the Kitty image as a metaphor for the creative potential of the spontaneous rave-style street protests that were launched by a range of Japanese youth groups in response to the American war against Iraq. It was not post-hippie organizing that drove their struggle, but their embrace of a philosophy of cute that shaped their explosive expression of global rage.

And it’s here that I find Kitty not only comforting, reassuring, and a friend in need (as well as a crack tennis player – for real!) – but also inspiring. I once remarked to a friend that I embraced what I referred to as Kitty praxis. He found this a bit hard to believe, but I don’t. You see, my hero used to be Judith Butler. For those who haven’t yet encountered this scholar and queer theorist, she more or less invented the notion of gender performativity and argued for parody and drag as strategic tools for cultural subversion. The problem is, with her pedantic and theory-heavy writing style, she became a hit for ivory towers the world over, and most of her ideas have either remained inaccessible to the general public or have been possessively hoarded by pompous-headed intellectuals. So much for that.

Kitty, on the other hand, successfully dodged the ivory tower blockade and launched a barrage of kawaii (a Japanese term which lies somewhere between ‘cool’ and ‘cute’) on an unsuspecting popular culture, 35 years ago. And her revolution of cute is still going strong. She may not have toppled global capitalism, but she hasn’t been co-opted by the global neoliberal machine (even if Taiwanese Eva Air *has* painted an entire airplane in her image). Subversion, queer theory, even punk rock – it’s all been absorbed by the powers that be. When I was doing my Masters degree, I could sign a paper with an anarchy symbol, hoist a hammer-and-sickle flag at my thesis proposal presentation, or stage a theatrical play in place of submitting a term paper – and my profs loved it. But the day I submitted a Hello Kitty image on the cover page of a term paper, and included a brief dedicatory verse to Kitty? I got a 5% grade penalization for trivializing the assignment, and the look in my prof’s eye was not disapproving – it was sheer fear and terror.

This morning on the subway, as I loitered in the doorway and the subway hurtled toward Ossington Station, one of the passengers got up in preparation to disembark. I couldn’t help but stare, because the young man had on a pink Mountain Equipment Co-Op vest, and a pink pair of pants, and a Hello Kitty baseball cap. I don’t know who he was, and probably never will, but for one brief moment our eyes met, and it was the age-old salute of cultural subversion in progress. While the rest of the subway car stared at him, he flicked his Hello Kitty baseball cap at a 45 degree sideways angle, flipped the collar of his Hello Kitty mountain climbing vest, and proudly hopped off the subway car. The gaping mouths of the other passengers made my day.

So feel free to hoist the red star or tattoo Che on your forehead, for all I care. My hero is 5 apples high, loves strawberry toothpaste, and neoliberal hegemony can’t touch her.

Happy Birthday Kitty!

Monday, November 2, 2009

ah right wing student movements, you have so much to fear

amazing post from "or perhaps" about the anti-canadian federation of students movement/right wing student movement!

go here and read it immediately:

http://orperhaps.blogspot.com/2009/11/whos-leading-attacks-against-canadian.html

i forgot to give this blog a title.

through the randomness that is the internet, i came across this today. it actually wasn't that random, "david wahl" posted a link to this website on our handerpants article, so i went to the website instead of printing out my sshrc application and getting ready for school.

so, random maybe, but here it is:
it's funny because it's true. christmas list! christmas list!

Sunday, November 1, 2009

happy birthday ralph klein!

it's former premier of alberta ralph klein's birthday today.

i was born in alberta, and raised there, and i can safely say that a lot of albertans fucking loved this dude. they LOVED ralph klein. they call him "ralph" and act like he's their best friend.

so, in honour of klein's 67th birthday i'd just like to relive his best moment as premier of alberta.

december 12, 2001: arguably klein's most famous moment. he has his chauffer drive him to a government supported shelter for homeless men at like 1am. shouting and swearing at the men, klein repeatedly told the men to get jobs and he threw change at them.

it's funny because a lot of the men in the shelter did have jobs, and were presumably trying to sleep so they could get up and go to them in the morning.

at first klein tried to deny that version of events. his chief of staff was all "no way, he wasn't drunk" and even went as far to say that klein visited the shelter out of the goodness of his heart.

eventually he had to admit he was drunk, has a drinking problem, and maybe he was wrong.

he remained premier until 2006 and the incident at the homeless shelter, while revealing a lot about alberta's approach to any social ifnrastructure issue, didn't put a dent in his political career.

only in alberta.


if you make stairs fun, people will use them more? interesting theory.

this video is a little experiment by thefuntheory.com, a stockholme based "volkswagon initiative" dedicated to finding fun ways to change human behaviour for the better:



it's pretty interesting, people love walking on piano stairs!

oh good, progress!

not so long ago we wrote about how, before he became president, obama said that he wanted to revoke the hiv travel ban but then when it came down to it he wasn't acting very fast.

the hiv travel ban, for those who don't know, disallows foreign nationals to cross into the united states if they are known to be hiv positive.

so if you didn't want to hide the fact that you were hiv positive, but you wanted to go into the united states, you had to apply for a special waiver.

well we just got this email:

"President Obama announced on October 30th the elimination of the HIV entry ban. A final rule will be published in the Federal Register on Monday, November 2nd and will take effect in early January 2010. That means that people who have HIV and are not U.S. citizens will be able to enter the U.S. starting in January next year. HHS will not able to fully implement the new regulation for another 60 days following the president’s announcement, but in the intervening months, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has directed its officers to place holds on any decisions regarding green card applications that are based solely on an individual’s HIV status pending full implementation of the new rule."

it's about time!

after obama announced his decision the UN put out a statement urging all nations with such restrictions to revoke them immediately, since they're discriminatory.

michael sidibe, UNAIDS executive director, stated that "placing travel restrictions on people living with HIV has no public health justification. it is also a violation of human rights."

no public health justification+violation of human rights=get rid of that shit!!!


Saturday, October 31, 2009

oh the olympics, what fun.

today on the cbc there was a story about the olympic flame, which apparently reached victoria yesterday.

unfortunately for the flame, and the people running it, there were a lot of angry people there waiting for the flame to arrive.

hundreds of activists blocked the flame's route, forcing the torchbearers to be "packed into vehicles and moved around the demonstration."

the protesters were there to draw attention to a lot of shit that has been ignored since the olympics took over. things like aboriginal rights, environmental issues, poverty, infrastructure, you know, little things.

did the protests raise awareness? do protests ever raise awareness? probably not.

but, the most important question has yet to be answered:

"it's not certain if the flame remained lit during the unexpected detour."



Tuesday, October 27, 2009

two year olds love to watch tv!

in the new york times today there was an article about a new study on how many hours kids watch tv.

it's not surprising that kids watch a lot of tv, but it was surprising that the kids who watched the most tv were only ages 2 to 5.

kids aged 2 to 5 watched more than 32 hours of television each week. that's like sitting in front of the tv and watching for a day and a half without stopping.

i get it, plop your kid in front of the tv for a few hours a week and it adds up, but 32 hours? that's insane. that's too much tv for a 2 year old. and what are they even watching?

when i was little i watched strawberry shortcake. i fucking LOVED that show. it was slow paced, but pretty, and the berry patch kids seemed like real kids.

it was cute. the theme song was about having a nice day with your nice friends, and you learned lessons.

strawberry shortcake, old school, was a farmer yo. she had to take care of those berry patches, because the best berries in the world don't just appear for nothing.

they also had to be careful, because the purple pie man always wanted to steal the berries for his pies. this taught kids about scary men who want something for nothing. in the wonderful world of strawberry short cake if you wanted to play hard, you had to work hard. it wasn't a perfect show, by any means, and there were definitely some questionable gender role lessons, but overall it was pretty good.



now there's a "new" strawberry shortcake who is "cool." she's tall and kind of skinny and she wears normal clothes. it's just not right. the theme song isn't very good and its just overall a stupid show.



i also used to love rainbow brite, which apparently is also getting a "makeover." there is no need to make her over! she single handedly defended the kingdom against murky and lurky and wore a sneaker/leg warmer combo. leave her alone!

so kids are watching more tv, and more crappier tv?

no wonder the world is fuct.


Monday, October 26, 2009

just one more.

well now i can't stop googling ads.

this one is great. it's like when you're at the beach trying to read your newspaper, and your woman won't stop bitching about something or other.

you just kill her, roll her up, stick her in a bag, and head on over to the gay bar to have a beer with your bros.

it's all about NOT being abused! i get it!

i stumbled upon this ad today:


whoever created this is genius. really. i mean, who else but a genius would think about using the fact that domestic abuse increases when women are pregnant as an AD for a website? sheer brilliance!

get it? its her BABY kicking her in the stomache, not her jealous, obsessive, abusive partner.

and our mothers are surprised when we tell them we like girls?

today i randomly remembered that one year for my birthday, my mom made a barbie doll birthday cake for me.

the theory behind the cake is that the skirt of the barbie dress is cake, and you just plop the barbie body into it and then make an icing dress.

it's kind of funny. it seems like such a normative girl thing, on the surface. but then i was thinking about how homoerotic it really is.

little girls like barbie, i guess. but apparently they also like eating a barbie's skirt off, then licking the icing bodice off of her.

it explains a lot.

the people doing this should probably stop.

today in the star they reported that "there's an alarming increase in the number of high-powered laser attacks on passenger jets and medical helicopters flying into GTA airspace, and police and transportation authorities aren't sure how to deal with it."

...what?! "high-powered laser attacks"? who the fuck is doing this?!

apparently unknown people have fired on planes and helicopters from various locations across the gta and so far there have been 28 attacks this year.

cliff rundle, a medical helicopter pilot, has had his helicopter beamed at three times and each time he was en route to the hospital with a critical patient. "it's distracting (and) it's a flight safety issue" he says.

umm, yeah. i think most normal human beings can understand that flashing a laser into the eyes of a pilot is probably an idiotic and dangerous thing to do. but people continue to do it.

a colleague of rundle's was beamed in the face and he suffered temporary retina damage and can't even fly anything for the next three months.

the green lasers used in these attacks are typically used to point out constellations and have a wave length "near the limit of the human eye's peak sensitivity."

this isn't the same as shining your laser pointer on the wall to confuse your cat, or into your neighbours bedroom window late at night to scare them.

this is a plane or a helicopter flying in the air. some pilots of reported being temporarily blinded by the lasers--like, hello, if your pilot is blind that's a really, really bad thing

whoever is shining lasers at planes and helicopters, maybe you could stop. maybe instead of pointing the lasers at planes you could use them to learn more about the constellations, you know, what they're intended for.


Saturday, October 24, 2009

handerpants!

on the huffington post today, i read about the most "ridiculous, wasteful consumer products ever".

however, they posted these:






clearly "handerpants: the underpants for your hands" are not a real product... get new fact checkers huffpost!

Friday, October 23, 2009

public option health care is stronger, slimmer, and hotter.

this commercial in favour of the public option for health care in the united states.

it's a pretty standard commercial, but it makes a pretty good point i think.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

guest blogger: "f.l.a.p.s FLOPS"

guest blogger molasses coady--captain molasses coady-- discusses the horror of his first martin singer encounter:


Until this week, I had no idea who Martin Singer was.

But in the past three days I’ve had an unexpected opportunity to get to know the newly appointed Dean of the newly created Faculty of Liberal Arts and Professional Studies at York University. The good thing is that now I know who he is. The bad thing is that I really wish I didn’t.

My first occasion to encounter him was at the annual Anthropology lecture. A distinguished guest scholar from California had been brought in to present the lecture; there was a panel of discussants; a delicious spread of meat and veggie-tofu skewers outside the lecture hall; a moving introduction to the lecturer by one of her admiring colleagues...and a kick-off speech to the whole event provided by none other than Dean Singer.

Of course, first of all we got to wait for 45 minutes in a crowded, overheated room because Dean Singer was late. When he finally arrived, the event got underway. He got up and launched into his speech, wherein he barely mentioned at all the lecture that he was introducing. Instead, he spoke about how the department was being reviewed as part of a review of the operations of the whole new faculty; how he had identified several challenges that were endemic to this department; how he knew it was going to be tough for the professors to work through those challenges but that he was willing to help them; that if they worked through those challenges, then maybe the rest of the university and the world would see the value of their department; that even though many of them were nervous about the ongoing review, they should have faith that their department head was doing a great job trying to defend them.

It was quite honestly the weirdest speech I’ve ever heard; or at least, the first time I’ve heard somebody try to introduce a lecture by insulting the audience (with the exception of the occasional bad comic...which might have been the angle he was going for). And then, to add insult to injury, he announced that he had another urgent engagement (who has an “urgent engagement” at 8:00pm on a weeknight??) and took off. Without even appreciating the lecture he was “introducing”!

I think I felt most badly for the visiting lecturer...she had to stand behind him, embarrassed, while he berated and insulted her audience. And then she had to try to make them excited about mushrooms and the nature of time.

Grudgingly, I put him out of my mind and went back to my papers. Then two days later, I received a copy of a 4-page letter he sent to professors in the new faculty. In a rambling tirade wherein he refers to himself in the third person (delusions of kinghood?), invents such phrases as “post-merger fatigue” (huh? don’t you get fatigue from things that drag on, not *new* initiatives?), says that the “over-politicization of campus” has brought down faculty morale, and refers to the university budget as a “bail-out package” (oh...didn’t realize my paycheque was actually a bail-out package from my employer...are bail-out packages taxable I wonder?), his underlying goal seems to be to create a sense of crisis. But he accomplishes a number of more subtle messaging goals as well.

First, he repeatedly emphasizes that he’s a new and externally recruited dean – a hapless victim of circumstance, if you will - who therefore bears no responsibility for the budgetary and administrative problems the faculty faces. Fair enough – but the excessive managerialism, concentration of administrative authority, exclusion of faculty/student input and marginalization of the ‘liberal arts’ are all underlying causes for those problems, and are trends which are epitomized by his very appointment. So yes, actually his presence *is* responsible for these problems.

Secondly, he reassures faculty that he’s working closely with their departmental chairs/heads, and there’s no need for them to worry because they’ll figure things out and then tell the faculty what they need to do. In other words, the era of democratic administration in universities is over and there’s no need for faculty or students to get involved in the shaping of their university. In fact they won’t provide any opportunity for them to either – that’s why they now hold ‘managerial retreats’ instead of faculty-wide meetings or collegial decision-making processes.

Finally, he proposes (or rather, imposes) a three-pronged strategy which says that solving the budget shortfall must be the first priority, but that never fear – “rebuilding full-time faculty ranks” MUST be our third-highest priority!!! Which sounds inspiring, until you realize that in a three-pronged strategy, the third-highest priority is actually the lowest priority. So let’s rephrase that: Rebuilding full-time faculty ranks MUST be our LOWEST priority! Suddenly it sounds less inspiring.

Of course, there’s plenty else in the letter, which concludes with the cliche “...Chinese curse: May you live in interesting times” (ironic, when one considers that this is the Dean which university press releases lauded as one of the foremost scholars in Chinese history...until it turned out they were wrong and he wasn’t).

In closing, three points:

1) Nice to meet you Dr. Singer, actually in retrospect no it’s not and now I’m sick of you and please go away.

2) Please stop introducing departmental lectures by insulting your audience and embarrassing the university in front of strangers and PLEASE stop referring to yourself in the third person.

3) You want to fix York’s problems? Stop holding managerial retreats, instead organize public deliberative sessions for faculty/students, and LISTEN before you “propose”. More importantly, stand up and fight for your faculty – don’t be the sort of two-faced administrator who acts like he’s just the bearer of bad news and he really wants to be your friend, while blaming you for your own problems and not being willing to put his own neck on the line to defend the principles of the university which he claims to believe in.

well, i guess i fucked up.

thank jesus i read the huffington post this morning!!

this article, by jag carrao, outlines the five mistakes of dating that women make(and how to fix them).

it's really important that articles like this get written and published once every few years to remind women of why feminism has duped them and why they will be alone forever if they don't play by the rules.

and no one wants to be alone forever, bridget jones taught us that much.

women, like dogs, need to be trained to approach relationships properly. jag writes that "correcting the errors of your ways can be done with a bit of practice" and this is true. it's like how eff and i have been training harry the beagle. he used to think the front door was his, but after a few weeks(or months) of us asserting our right over the door it's ours again. alternatively, you'd be surprised what a little raw hot dog can do for beagle behaviour.

so, applying the same general "raw hot dog" strategy to women and relationships is bound to work.

jag also writes that the most common of dating mistakes stem from "underlying issues of self-esteem"

without further ado, the five mistakes women make in dating(because men don't make mistakes):

number one: don't approach him first.

we were ever tricked on this one! apparently "conventional dating advice... encourages women to flirt and even strike up a conversation." this is WRONG. do not even attempt to do this ladies, it is bad news.

you know why it's bad news? because if you approach him you shouldn't be surprised when down the road he won't commit to you because a "man may date and even marry a woman who approached him first, but there will likely be consequences later on." you need to let the mens approach you, because men will approach the girls they "really want."

don't worry, you can fix this problem.

jag's quick fix is that "if you talked to him first or even asked him out"(you silly girl), you can still TRY to "restore some of the feminine mystique" that you have up when you became the initiator.

you have to be more elusive and mysterious. less available. and if dude likes you he'll come after you. but for god's sake, do not try to initiate contact with a man again, you have to "please, trust the universe!"

ok, dating mistake number 2: acting overly chummy.

um, obviously. you don't want to be FRIENDS with this guy. don't talk to him about your life, what you're thinking, your day because that's "yuck!!" jag advises women not to do this because it makes you look "desperate and neurotic."

fix this, bitch! the more time you spend talking, the less time you have to list to what the man has to say--and that is what is truly important at this stage in your relationship.

dating mistake number three: accepting last minute dates

jag says that women need to show men that they're busy, have friends, deadlines, projects, and prospects. if you accept a "spontaneous" invite to hang out or go on a date then you're sending the wrong message.

you need to trick him into thinking you're a busy and fancy girl. because "fancy restaurants-like fancy girls-require reservations made well in advance."

to fix this situation you've gotten yourself into by agreeing to a last minute date, you have to immediately start adhering to the three day rule. if he doesn't call you three days in in advance then you have to say no to the date.

jag says it's important to make sure you're his "plan A" girl and not his "plan B" girl. this is true, because we all know that plan B is for sluts.

dating mistake number four: whirlwind romances.

jag uses the scariest person alive to exemplify this one: jennifer aniston. men fall in love quickly, but fall out of love just as fast. you might have fun going all out but his interest is definitely going to fizzle. like jennifer aniston, you will not be happy unless you have a constant partner. being rich and beautiful, having as much freedom as you could ever want, being able to travel, whatever. none of this matters unless you have a man to share it with. don't be jennifer aniston.

so to fix this you have to do a few things: don't see him more than once or twice a week, don't talk longer than ten minutes on the phone, don't open up or introduce him to your friends. if he wants to do any of things, well then "there's this arrangement called marriage.

and finally, mistake number five: wasting time

the relationship isn't going anywhere(which means you're not getting married) OR you're not out looking for love because you're getting over a "heartbreak." well fuck that shit, you need to shape up or ship out!

the only way to fix this is to "know what you want." want to get married to your long term boyfriend? set a time limit, and if he doesn't marry you, you need to leave him. if you're just wallowing in self pity after a break up, snap out of it! put an online profile up on the internets and spread the word that you're single. that's not desperate, it's proactive.

so there you have it, women of the world, all of the mistakes you're making. finding a partner shouldn't just be a casual thing, it demands scheduling, lies, manipulation, and careful long term strategic planning.

so take is seriously, if we can train our beagle you can most certainly train yourself to be an acceptable date.



Wednesday, October 21, 2009

dear ladies: michael ignatieff is on your side and he will make everything alright again.


i actually laughed out loud when i read this today:

"liberal leader michael ignatieff is committing his party, if elected, to improve equal pay for women, launch a full-scale investigation of missing aboriginal women and establish a national program of day-care and early learning."

so if michael ignatieff is elected prime minister of canada in the next election he is going to just snap his fingers and do everything that feminist activists and politicians have been trying to do for decades? he's going to reverse the damage that stephen harper's conservatives have inflicted?

he's going to save the world yo!!!

maybe he realized that his charm isn't going to work on the ladies this time around.

call me a skeptic, but where was ignatieff when all of things he proposes to fix were implemented?

where was ignatieff's demand of a public apology when harper denied the existence of colonialism in canada? because, in case you didn't know, that has a hell of a lot to do with the "missing aboriginal women" ignatieff plans on investigating.

where was he when the conservatives tried to make it impossible for women to access the human rights commission to address pay equity concerns?

a national program of day care? so ignatieff is going to single handedly fix the day care problem? a problem that is still one of the biggest barriers for women with children who want to access education or employment?

when michael ignatieff criticized israeli apartheid week and didn't challenge jason kenney's decision to not allow george galloway to come into canada, did he realize that a lot of the organizers of the events were young women? did he realize that by participating in the attack on israeli apartheid events he was condoning the subsequent harassment of such women?? did he even think about how his actions affected women in both israel and palestine?

does he think women are stupid? that all he has to do to win is say "don't worry baby, ima fix these problems for you"? i don't know anybody who is that stupid.

here's what i think, i think that ignatieff should start pushing for these changes NOW. he doesn't need to be the prime minister of the country to stand for aboriginal women's rights or national day care. he doesn't need to be the prime minister to support pay equity.

so instead of holding all of these issues over women's heads to obtain their vote, why doesn't ignatieff prove to us now that he's worth our vote.


dear adam giambrone: want to be mayor of toronto? make my bus come on time.

so david miller is going to retire as mayor of the city of toronto. guess who wants to take his place?
adam giambrone, the chair of the TTC.

if you don't know, giambrone is really young. maybe he's too young to be the mayor.

i think there's only one way for him to prove that he can do the job and that's to make the buses run on schedule, once and for all.

as a york student i take the ttc a lot. like, a lot alot. and it's not just a subway ride--the commute is a subway, then bus. sometimes its a bus, subway, then bus again.

that's how it was yesterday. dupont bus east, subway north, york rocket bus to school. it's isn't pleasant but when everything is running on time it isn't horrible.

yesterday, nothing ran on time. specifically, the dupont bus didn't run on time. and you know what? the dupont bus NEVER runs on time. ask eff, she takes it every day to work and sometimes she's actually late for work because the bus is never on time.

either the dupont bus is late or it's so early that you miss it.

it was fifteen minutes late yesterday morning. when the bus is supposed to arrive at 10:32 am and you get to the bus stop more than five minutes early just to be safe, then it doesn't arrive for like twenty minutes there is something seriously wrong.

later on that night after some birthday celebrating with eff, i had to take the bathurst street car to the subway, then the ossington bus. usually i bike.

the bathurst street car was late. then, the ossington bus was late. not just a little bit late but seriously, seriously fucking late.

at like, midnight, when there is little to no traffic, why is the bus late? and like, half an hour late?

i actually ended up leaving the ossington station and walking up ossington to dupont, and the bus only went by when i reached dupont.

so, while i liked that giambrone tried to get the UPASS adopted, i'm not really that impressed with how the ttc runs. especially when it's so expensive.

so that's the challenge: make the ttc run on schedule, even close to the schedule, and that will prove that maybe you can run the city.

lesson: if you leave your mess long enough it will become a monster and try to eat you

maybe you've never seen a better monster before?




read more here

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

NO. no no no no no. no. please god no.

if rainbow brite were a real person, and she had facebook, her status would read: FML.

that's because the powers that be have decided that the time is ripe for a rainbow brite remake.

in true remake fashion they've decided to make her and her friends skinnier, taller, with pouty lips and big makeup-ey eyes.

even the horses look sluttier.

perez hilton aptly writes: "just what little girls need - another image they can't conform to!"

enough! no more remakes!!!
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...